Skip to contents

Pre-computed rejection counts replicating Table_UV_CSPA.xlsx from the Li, Liao and Quaedvlieg (2022) replication package. For each of 28 stocks, pairwise conditional superior predictive ability (CSPA) tests are run for every benchmark-competitor pair across six realized-variance forecasting models; cell \((k, l)\) counts the number of stocks for which the null “benchmark \(l\) conditionally dominates alternative \(k\)” is rejected at the 5% level. Conditioning variable is one-day-lagged VIX; loss is QLIKE.

Usage

llq2022_uv_cspa

Format

A list with the following components:

mine

\(6 \times 6\) integer matrix of rejection counts produced by forecastdom::cspa_test with R = 10000 bootstrap reps and AIC pre-whitening, matching the call signature in Empirics_Volatility.ox.

paper

\(6 \times 6\) integer matrix from Table_UV_CSPA.xlsx in the LLQ replication package.

losses

\(28 \times 6\) matrix of mean QLIKE loss per stock and model.

tickers

Character vector of the 28 tickers used.

models

Character vector of the six model names.

level

Significance level used (0.05).

R

Number of bootstrap replications used.

Source

Computed by data-raw/llq2022_uv_cspa.R from the replication package of Li, Liao and Quaedvlieg (2022), https://zenodo.org/record/4884813.

References

Li, J., Liao, Z. and Quaedvlieg, R. (2022). Conditional Superior Predictive Ability. Review of Economic Studies, 89(2), 843-875.